There is often a requirement to evaluate descriptive statistics for data within an organization or for health care information. Every year, the National Canc

There is often a requirement to evaluate descriptive statistics for data within an organization or for health care information. Every year, the National Cancer Institute collects and publishes data based on patient demographics. Understanding differences between the groups based upon the collected data often informs health care professionals about research, treatment options, or patient education.

Using the data on the “National Cancer Institute Data” Excel spreadsheet (attached), calculate the descriptive statistics indicated below for each of the race/ethnicity groups. Refer to your textbook and the topic Resources, as needed, for assistance with creating Excel formulas.

Provide the following descriptive statistics:

  1. Measures of central tendency: mean, median, and mode.
  2. Measures of variation: variance, standard deviation, and range (a formula is not needed for range).
  3. Once the data are calculated, provide a 150-250-word analysis of the descriptive statistics on the spreadsheet. This should include differences and health outcomes between groups.

APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

This assignment uses a rubric (attached). Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. 

Sheet1

American Indian / Alaska Native (includes Hispanic) Asian / Pacific Islander (includes Hispanic) Black (includes Hispanic) Hispanic (any race) White (includes Hispanic) National Cancer Institute (2018) Lung and bronchus cancer. Retrieved from January 8, 2019 from https://seer.cancer.gov/explorer/application.php?site=47&data_type=1&graph_type=2&compareBy=race&chk_sex_1=1&chk_race_5=5&chk_race_4=4&chk_race_3=3&chk_race_6=6&chk_race_2=2&chk_age_range_1=1&chk_data_type_1=1&advopt_precision=1&advopt_display=1&showDataFor=sex_1_and_age_range_1_and_data_type_1
Year of Diagnosis Rate per 100,000 Rate per 100,000 Rate per 100,000 Rate per 100,000 Rate per 100,000
2000 45.7 41.8 77.8 34.2 68.8
2001 47.9 41 79 34.1 68.7
2002 44.6 40.4 75.8 34.1 68
2003 50 40.9 77.3 34.5 67.1
2004 51.7 40.5 75.1 35 65.8
2005 48.7 40.2 73.7 33.8 65.9
2006 46.4 39.8 73.4 32 65.8
2007 43.1 38.8 71.2 32.7 65.2
2008 45 38.5 70.8 32.2 63.9
2009 40.1 39 71.6 31.8 63.1
2010 42.4 37 67.8 30.3 60.4
2011 39.6 36.6 64.1 29.4 58.5
2012 36.6 36.7 64.3 28.2 57.5
2013 39.9 36.6 60.5 28.8 56.3
2014 32 34 61.3 26.8 55.4
2015 38.7 34.4 57.4 26 53.2

,

Summary and Descriptive Statistics – Rubric

Measures of Central Tendency 35 points

Criteria Description

Mean, Median and Mode

5. Target 35 points

Measures of central tendency, including the mean, median, and mode, are

calculated correctly.

4. Acceptable 29.75 points

N/A

3. Approaching 26.25 points

Measures of central tendency, including the mean, median, and mode, are mostly

calculated, but one required calculation is missing.

2. Insufficient 22.75 points

Measures of central tendency, including the mean, median, and mode, are partially

calculated, but two required calculations are missing.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Measures of central tendency are not calculated.

Collapse All

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Measures of Variation 35 points

Criteria Description

Variance, Standard Deviation, and Range

5. Target 35 points

Measures of central variation, including variance, standard deviation, and range,

are calculated correctly for variance and standard deviation. Range is identified.

4. Acceptable 29.75 points

N/A

3. Approaching 26.25 points

Measures of central variation, including variance, standard deviation, and range,

are mostly calculated, but one required calculation is missing.

2. Insufficient 22.75 points

Measures of central variation, including variance, standard deviation, and range,

are partially calculated.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Measures of variation are not calculated.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Analysis of Descriptive Statistics 35 points

Criteria Description

5. Target 35 points

Analysis of the descriptive statistics for differences and health outcome

recommendations between the groups is thorough, accurate, and includes

substantial explanation and supporting details.

4. Acceptable 29.75 points

Analysis of the descriptive statistics for differences and health outcome

recommendations between the groups is complete and mostly accurate and

contains explanation.

3. Approaching 26.25 points

Analysis of the descriptive statistics for differences and health outcome

recommendations between the groups is included but lacks accuracy, explanation,

or relevant supporting details.

2. Insufficient 22.75 points

Analysis of the descriptive statistics for differences and health outcome

recommendations between the groups is incomplete or incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Analysis of the descriptive statistics for differences and health outcome

recommendations between the groups is not included.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Excel Formulas 28 points

Criteria Description

5. Target 28 points

Excel formulas are complete and correct for all problems.

4. Acceptable 23.8 points

Excel formulas are included for all problems and contain only minor errors.

3. Approaching 21 points

Excel formulas are mostly included and contain minor errors.

2. Insufficient 18.2 points

Excel formulas are partially included or contain significant errors that affect

problem solutions.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Excel formulas are incomplete or incorrect.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Mechanics of Writing 7 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence

structure, etc.?

5. Target 7 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence

structure are used throughout.?

4. Acceptable 5.95 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence

structure are used.

3. Approaching 5.25 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally

appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.?

2. Insufficient 4.55 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language

choice or sentence structure are recurrent.??

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language

choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.??

Total 140 points

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.