Topic: Children or Adolescences with Tics and Tourette Disorders.
- Recommend one FDA-approved drug, one off-label drug, and one nonpharmacological intervention for treating your assigned disorder in children and adolescents.
- Explain the risk assessment you would use to inform your treatment decision making. What are the risks and benefits of the FDA-approved medicine? What are the risks and benefits of the off-label drug?
- Explain whether clinical practice guidelines exist for this disorder and, if so, use them to justify your recommendations. If not, explain what information you would need to take into consideration.
- Support your reasoning with at least three scholarly resources, one each on the FDA-approved drug, the off-label, and a non-medication intervention for the disorder. Attach the PDFs of your source
Please see the attached for more specific instructions*********
Due Sunday by 11:59pm Points 100 Submitting a text entry box or a file upload Attempts 0 Allowed Attempts 2
Start Assignment
Back to Week at a Glance (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/147508/modules/items/5781435)
Off-label prescribing is when a physician gives you a drug that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved to treat a condition different than your condition. This practice is legal and common.
In fact, one in five prescriptions written today are for off-label use.
—Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
PRESCRIBING FOR CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS
(https://cdn-
media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/OrigImage-LgRendition/GettyLicense_122524533.jpg)
12/12/24, 5:18 PM Week 3: Assignment 1
https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/147508/assignments/1906561 1/6
For this Assignment, you consider these questions and others as you explore FDA-approved (“on label”) pharmacological treatments, non-FDA-approved (“off-label”) pharmacological treatments, and nonpharmacological treatments for disorders in children and adolescents.
RESOURCES
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity. Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
WEEKLY RESOURCE (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/147508/modules/items/5781451)
TO PREPARE Your Instructor will assign a specific disorder for you to research for this Assignment. Use the Walden library to research evidence-based treatments for your assigned disorder in children and adolescents. You will need to recommend one FDA-approved drug, one off-label drug, and one nonpharmacological intervention for treating this disorder in children and adolescents.
THE ASSIGNMENT (1–2 PAGES)
Reference:
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2015). Off-label drugs: What you need to know. https://www.ahrq.gov/patients-
consumers/patient-involvement/off-label-drug-usage.html (https://www.ahrq.gov/patients-consumers/patient-involvement/off-label-drug-
usage.html)
12/12/24, 5:18 PM Week 3: Assignment 1
https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/147508/assignments/1906561 2/6
NRNP_6665_Week3_Assignment1_Rubric
Recommend one FDA-approved drug, one off-label drug, and one nonpharmacological intervention for treating your assigned disorder in children and adolescents. Explain the risk assessment you would use to inform your treatment decision making. What are the risks and benefits of the FDA-approved medicine? What are the risks and benefits of the off-label drug? Explain whether clinical practice guidelines exist for this disorder and, if so, use them to justify your recommendations. If not, explain what information you would need to take into consideration. Support your reasoning with at least three scholarly resources, one each on the FDA-approved drug, the off-label, and a non-medication intervention for the disorder. Attach the PDFs of your sources.
BY DAY 7 OF WEEK 3 Submit your Assignment.
SUBMISSION INFORMATION Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK3Assgn1+last name+first initial.
2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page. 3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.
12/12/24, 5:18 PM Week 3: Assignment 1
https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/147508/assignments/1906561 3/6
Criteria Ratings Pts
25 pts
25 pts
In 1–2 pages, address the following: • Recommend one FDA-approved drug, one off-label drug, and one nonpharmacological intervention for treating your assigned disorder in children and adolescents.
25 to >22.0 pts Excellent
The response accurately and concisely explains one FDA-approved drug, one off-label drug, and one nonpharmacological intervention that would be appropriate for treating the assigned disorder in children and adolescents.
22 to >19.0 pts Good
The response accurately explains one FDA-approved drug, one off-label drug, and one nonpharmacological intervention that would be appropriate for treating the assigned disorder in children and adolescents.
19 to >17.0 pts Fair
The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains one FDA- approved drug, one off-label drug, and one nonpharmacological intervention that would be appropriate for treating the assigned disorder in children and adolescents.
17 to >0 pts Poor
The response vaguely or inaccurately explains interventions that would be appropriate for treating the assigned disorder in children and adolescents. Interventions may not represent the three types of interventions required, or response may be missing.
• Explain the risk assessment you would use to inform your treatment decision making. What are the risks and benefits of the FDA-approved medicine? What are the risks and benefits of the off-label drug?
25 to >22.0 pts Excellent
The response accurately and concisely explains the risk assessment you would use to inform your treatment decision making. A concise and accurate explanation of the risks and benefits of each pharmacological intervention is provided.
22 to >19.0 pts Good
The response accurately explains the risk assessment you would use to inform your treatment decision making. An adequate explanation of the risks and benefits of each pharmacological intervention is provided.
19 to >17.0 pts Fair
The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains the risk assessment you would use to inform your treatment decision making. The explanation of the risks and benefits of each pharmacological intervention is somewhat vague or inaccurate.
17 to >0 pts Poor
The response vaguely or inaccurately explains the risk assessment you would use to inform your treatment decision making. The risks and benefits of each pharmacological intervention is vague or inaccurate. Or, the response is missing.
12/12/24, 5:18 PM Week 3: Assignment 1
https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/147508/assignments/1906561 4/6
Criteria Ratings Pts
25 pts
10 pts
5 pts
• Explain whether clinical practice guidelines exist for this disorder and, if so, use them to justify your recommendations. If not, explain what information you would need to take into consideration.
25 to >22.0 pts Excellent
The response accurately and concisely uses either clinical guidelines (if available) or other information from the literature to justify intervention recommendations.
22 to >19.0 pts Good
The response accurately uses either clinical guidelines (if available) or other information from the literature to justify intervention recommendations.
19 to >17.0 pts Fair
The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately uses either clinical guidelines (if available) or other information from the literature to justify intervention recommendations.
17 to >0 pts Poor
The response vaguely or inaccurately uses either clinical guidelines (if available) or other information from the literature to justify intervention recommendations. Or, the response is missing.
• Support your reasoning with at least three scholarly resources, one each on the FDA-approved drug, the off-label, and a non-medication intervention for the disorder. Be sure they are current (no more than 5 years old). Attach the PDFs of your sources.
10 to >8.0 pts Excellent The response provides at least three current, evidence-based resources from the literature to support the intervention recommendations. The resources reflect the latest clinical guidelines and provide strong justification for decision making.
8 to >7.0 pts Good The response provides at least three current, evidence-based resources from the literature to support the intervention recommendations.
7 to >6.0 pts Fair Three evidence- based resources are provided to support the intervention recommendations, but they may only provide vague or weak justification.
6 to >0 pts Poor Two or fewer resources are provided to support the intervention recommendations. The resources may not be current or evidence based.
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well- developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate
5 to >4.0 pts Excellent Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are
4 to >3.5 pts Good Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the
3.5 to >3.0 pts Fair Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%– 79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the
3 to >0 pts Poor Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity <60% of the time. No purpose
12/12/24, 5:18 PM Week 3: Assignment 1
https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/147508/assignments/1906561 5/6
Total Points: 100
Criteria Ratings Pts
5 pts
5 pts
continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused— neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.
provided that delineate all required criteria.
assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.
assignment are vague or off topic.
statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.
Written Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5 to >4.0 pts Excellent Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors
4 to >3.5 pts Good Contains one or two grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors
3.5 to >3.0 pts Fair Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors
3 to >0 pts Poor Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/narrative in-text citations, and reference list.
5 to >4.0 pts Excellent
Uses correct APA format with no errors
4 to >3.5 pts Good
Contains one or two APA format errors
3.5 to >3.0 pts Fair
Contains several (three or four) APA format errors
3 to >0 pts Poor
Contains many (five or more) APA format errors
12/12/24, 5:18 PM Week 3: Assignment 1
https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/147508/assignments/1906561 6/6