Describe a clinical or research scenario that requires the use of a microscope. What microscope is the best choice for your scenario and why? What would be your second choice?
- Minimum of 2 posts (1 initial and 1 follow-up)
- Minimum of 2 sources cited (assigned readings OR Concepts/edapt and an outside scholarly source)
- APA format for in-text citations and list of references
BIOS242: Weekly Discussion Rubric
Grading Rubric
Criteria |
Outstanding |
Very Good |
Competent |
Poor |
Initial Post Content |
7 points |
5 points |
3 points |
0 points |
Addresses ALL aspects of the initial discussion question(s), applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding regarding ALL weekly concepts. |
Addresses MOST aspects of the initial discussion question(s), applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding of MOST of the weekly concepts. |
Addresses SOME aspects of the initial discussion question(s), applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding of SOME of the weekly concepts. |
Minimally addresses the initial discussion question(s) or does not address the initial question(s). |
|
Initial Post Evidence & Sources |
4 points |
3 points |
2 points |
0 points |
Integrates evidence to support discussion from assigned readings OR online lessons, AND at least one outside scholarly source. Sources are credited. |
Integrates evidence to support discussion from assigned readings OR online lessons. Sources are credited. |
Integrates evidence to support discussion only from an outside source with no mention of assigned readings or lessons. Sources are credited. |
Does not integrate any evidence. |
|
Follow-Up Post |
8 points |
6 points |
4 points |
0 points |
Response furthers the dialogue by providing more information and clarification, thereby adding much depth to the discussion. |
Response furthers the dialogue by adding some depth to the discussion. |
Response does not further the dialogue significantly; adds little depth to the discussion. |
Does not respond to another student or instructor. |
|
Professional Communication |
4 points |
3 points |
2 points |
0 points |
Presents information using clear and concise language in an organized manner (minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation). |
Presents information in an organized manner (few errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation). |
Presents information using understandable language but is somewhat disorganized (some errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation). |
Presents information that is not clear, logical, professional, or organized to the point that the reader has difficulty understanding the message (numerous errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and/or punctuation). |
|
Frequency of Responses |
2 points |
0 points |
||
Posts in the discussion on two different days. |
Posts fewer than two different days OR does not participate at all. |
|||
Total Points Possible = 25 points |
©2023 Chamberlain University